敬告作者朋友
最近我们发现,有一些假冒本刊在线投稿系统的网站,采用与《麦类作物学报》相似的网页、网址和邮箱发送征稿通知以及收取审稿费、版面费的信息,以骗取钱财。详细情况见【通知公告】栏的“再次提醒作者朋友:谨防上当受骗!!!”

关闭
李 丽,贾文欣,徐 昊,李春燕,丁锦峰,朱 敏,郭文善,朱新开.缓释肥类型及其运筹方式对弱筋小麦产量及品质的影响[J].麦类作物学报,2024,(6):758
缓释肥类型及其运筹方式对弱筋小麦产量及品质的影响
Effects of Types and Application Methods of Slow-Release Fertilizer on Yield and Quality of Weak-Gluten Wheat
  
DOI:
中文关键词:  弱筋小麦  缓释肥  产量  氮素积累转运  品质  经济效益
英文关键词:Weak-gluten wheat  Slow-release fertilizer  Yield  Nitrogen accumulation and transport  Quality  Economic benefit
基金项目:江苏省碳达峰碳中和科技创新专项(BE2022312);江苏省现代农业产业技术体系建设专项(JATS\[2023\]459);江苏省科技副总项目(FZ20211404);江苏高校优势学科建设工程项目(苏政办发[2018]87号);扬州市名师工作室资助项目
作者单位
李 丽,贾文欣,徐 昊,李春燕,丁锦峰,朱 敏,郭文善,朱新开 (1.江苏省作物遗传生理重点实验室/扬州大学小麦研究中心江苏扬州 225009 2.江苏省粮食作物现代产业技术协同创新中心江苏扬州 225009 3.教育部农业与农产品安全国际合作联合实验室江苏扬州 225009) 
摘要点击次数: 126
全文下载次数: 114
中文摘要:
      为探究缓释肥类型及施用模式对小麦产量和品质的调控作用及机制,以弱筋小麦扬麦33为供试材料,选取3种类型(8种品牌)的缓释肥\[包膜型缓释肥(S1~S5)、合成型微溶性缓释肥(S6)、化学抑制剂型缓释肥(S7、S8)\]作为供试氮源,设置缓释肥一次性基施(M1)和基施60%+返青期追施40%(M2)两种施肥模式,常规尿素施肥(基肥∶壮蘖肥∶拔节肥∶孕穗肥为5∶1∶2∶2)为对照(CK),分析了相同施氮水平下缓释肥类型及其运筹方式对小麦产量、氮素积累转运、氮效率、品质和效益的影响。结果表明,与CK相比,同一品牌缓释肥在不同施肥模式下小麦产量、开花期和成熟期氮素积累、籽粒氮素积累、花前氮素转运量及转运效率、花后氮素积累及其对籽粒的贡献率和氮利用效率均表现为M2>CK>M1。其中,M2模式下小麦显著增产的缓释肥依次为S6>S1>S2>S3>S8。M1模式下各处理小麦籽粒品质指标均符合弱筋小麦国家标准;M2模式下除S2、S6外,其余缓释肥的小麦籽粒品质指标均符合弱筋品质要求。除M2S5外,其余处理产值及净效益均表现为M2>CK>M1。综合认为,本试验条件下,S1(硫包膜型)、S3(树脂包膜型)、S8(抑制型)缓释肥基施60%+返青期追施40%可实现弱筋小麦产量、品质、氮效率和经济效益的协同提升。
英文摘要:
      In order to explore the regulation effect and mechanism of different types and application modes of slow-release fertilizer on yield and quality of wheat, a weak-gluten wheat variety Yangmai 33 was used as experimental material, and three types (eight different brands) of slow-release fertilizers were selected as the test nitrogen sources\[including coated slow-release fertilizers (S1-S5), synthetic slightly soluble slow-release fertilizer (S6), and chemically inhibited slow-release fertilizers (S7, S8)\], with two fertilization modes of slow-release fertilizer: 100% slow-release fertilizer applied pre-sowing (M1) and 60% slow-release fertilizer applied pre-sowing and 40% slow-release fertilizer applied at re-greening (M2). Conventional urea fertilization was used as the control (CK) with base fertilizer: tiller fertilizer: jointing fertilizer: panicle fertilizer was 5∶1∶2∶2. The effects of different types of slow-release fertilizers and their application methods on wheat yield, nitrogen accumulation and transport, nitrogen efficiency, quality and economic benefits were investigated under the same nitrogen application level. The results showed that compared with CK, the wheat yield, nitrogen accumulation at anthesis and maturity, grain nitrogen accumulation, pre-anthesis nitrogen transport and rate, post-anthesis nitrogen accumulation and its contribution rate to grain and nitrogen utilization efficiency of the same slow-release fertilizer variety all ranked as M2>CK>M1. Under M2 model, the order of the slow-release fertilizer caused wheat yield increased significant was S6>S1>S2>S3>S8. Under M1 mode, the quality of the eight kinds of slow-release fertilizers conformed to the national standard of weak-gluten wheat. Under M2 model, the grain quality indices of all treatments except for S2 and S6 met the requirements of weak-gluten quality, and except that the net benefit of M2S5, the output value and net benefit of other treatments ranked as M2>CK>M1. According to the comprehensive view, under the conditions of this experiment, S1 (sulfur coated type), S3 (resin coated type) and S8 (inhibitory type) under the ferilization mode of 60% slow-release fertilizer applied pre-snowing and 40% slow-release fertilizer applied at re-greening can jointly improve the yield, quality, nitrogen efficiency and economic benefits of weak-gluten wheat.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭

您是第21174586位访问者
版权所有麦类作物学报编辑部
京ICP备09084417号
技术支持: 本系统由北京勤云科技发展有限公司设计