敬告作者朋友
最近我们发现,有一些假冒本刊在线投稿系统的网站,采用与《麦类作物学报》相似的网页、网址和邮箱发送征稿通知以及收取审稿费、版面费的信息,以骗取钱财。详细情况见【通知公告】栏的“再次提醒作者朋友:谨防上当受骗!!!”

关闭
盛 婧,刘红江,孙国峰,张丽萍,郑建初.不同钾吸收类型小麦品种(系)秸秆还田对农田钾素平衡的影响[J].麦类作物学报,2016,36(12):1643
不同钾吸收类型小麦品种(系)秸秆还田对农田钾素平衡的影响
Effect of Straw Return on Potassium Balance for Wheat Varieties(Lines) with Different Types of Potassium Absorption
  
DOI:10.7606/j.issn.1009-1041.2016.12.14
中文关键词:  小麦品种  秸秆还田  钾素  养分返还量  养分平衡
英文关键词:Wheat varieties  Straw return  Potassium  Nutrient return  Nutrient balance
基金项目:国家科技支撑计划项目(2012BAD14B12)
作者单位
盛 婧,刘红江,孙国峰,张丽萍,郑建初 (江苏省农业科学院农业资源与环境研究所江苏南京 210014) 
摘要点击次数: 831
全文下载次数: 565
中文摘要:
      为明确不同小麦品种(系)秸秆还田对土壤钾素平衡的影响,采用大田试验,研究了32个小麦品种(系)成熟期植株的钾含量及分布,对比分析了秸秆直接就地还田与收获不还田条件下不同小麦品种(系)钾素的携出量、回田量与土壤钾素盈亏量。结果表明,在麦田钾肥施用量为93 kg·hm-2 条件下,秸秆还田后,小麦植株返还到土壤中的钾素量高达60.4~146.3 kg·hm-2。与秸秆不还田相比,秸秆还田多向农田返还钾素44.6~112.6 kg·hm-2。在秸秆还田条件下,种植所有品种(系)的土壤钾素均呈现大量盈余状态,其盈余量为65.7~81.3 kg·hm-2,占施钾量的70.7%~87.4%。秸秆还田还有利于缩小不同品种(系)种植农田土壤钾素的差异。秸秆不还田条件下农田钾素盈亏状况在品种(系)间差异显著,而秸秆还田条件下不同品种(系)间农田钾素盈亏状况差异较小。钾高效吸收型小麦品种(系)具有较高的钾素携出量和回田量及较低的土壤盈余量,而钾低效吸收型小麦品种(系)则具有较低的钾素携出量和回田量及较高的土壤盈余量。从土壤可持续发展而言,无论小麦品种(系)钾吸收效率高低,秸秆还田条件下麦田均应大幅减少钾肥施用量。
英文摘要:
      To clarify the effects of straw return on soil potassium(K) balance for different wheat varieties(lines),plant K concentration and distribution of 32 wheat varieties(lines) were studied, and K uptake and return amounts and soil K balance under the conditions of straw return and no straw return were analyzed by field trial. The results showed that at the currently widely-used K fertilizer application rate(i.e. 93 kg K·hm-2), when wheat straw was returned to field, K rate returned to soil with plant residue return was 60.4 to 146.3 kg·hm-2, which was 44.6 to 112.6 kg·hm-2 higher than no straw return. With straw return, a relative large K surplus in soil was observed in all wheat varieties(lines),and the soil K surplus rate was 65.7 to 81.3 kg·hm-2, accounting for 70.7% to 87.4% of K fertilizer application rate. Straw return was also beneficial for lessening the difference of soil K balance among these wheat varieties. The wheat varieties(lines) with high K absorption ability had high K rate returned to soil with plant residue return and removed rate from soil with grain harvest, but low K surplus in soil; while the wheat varieties(lines) with low K absorption ability had a contrasting performance. From the view of soil sustainable development, the application rate of K fertilizer should be significantly reduced in wheat field with straw return.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭

您是第19626964位访问者
版权所有麦类作物学报编辑部
京ICP备09084417号
技术支持: 本系统由北京勤云科技发展有限公司设计