敬告作者朋友
最近我们发现,有一些假冒本刊在线投稿系统的网站,采用与《麦类作物学报》相似的网页、网址和邮箱发送征稿通知以及收取审稿费、版面费的信息,以骗取钱财。详细情况见【通知公告】栏的“再次提醒作者朋友:谨防上当受骗!!!”

关闭
史文琦,高振兴,杨立军,汪 华,曾凡松,向礼波,龚双军,喻大昭.小麦赤霉病穗组织中亚洲镰刀菌定量分析及其在品种(系)抗性评价中的应用[J].麦类作物学报,2014,34(1):132
小麦赤霉病穗组织中亚洲镰刀菌定量分析及其在品种(系)抗性评价中的应用
Real-time PCR Quantification of Fusarium asiaticum in Inoculated Head Tissues of Wheat and Its Application Value on Evaluation of Cultivar (Line) Resistance
  
DOI:10.7606/j.issn.1009-1041.2014.01.22
中文关键词:  小麦赤霉病  亚洲镰刀菌  分子定量分析  抗性评价〖WTBZ〗
英文关键词:Fusarium head blight of wheat  Fusarium asiaticum  Molecular quantification  Resistance evaluation
基金项目:国家公益性行业(农业)科研专项(20130316);国家“十二五”支撑计划项目(2012BAD19B04);国家小麦产业技术体系项目(CARS-03-04B)。
作者单位
史文琦,高振兴,杨立军,汪 华,曾凡松,向礼波,龚双军,喻大昭 (1.湖北省农业科学院植保土肥研究所农作物重大病虫草害防控湖北省重点实验室湖北武汉 4300642.泰州出入境检验检疫局江苏泰州 225300) 
摘要点击次数: 1153
全文下载次数: 982
中文摘要:
      为探明小麦穗中亚洲镰刀菌Fusarium asiaticum积累菌量与品种赤霉病抗性的关系,并探讨该菌定量分析方法在品种抗性评价中的应用价值,用TaqMan探针实时荧光定量PCR法对接种5 d和10 d后的9个小麦品种(系)穗组织中的F. asiaticum DNA进行测定,并与相应品种(系)田间抗性调查结果进行比较。结果表明,在F. asiaticum DNA定量检测中,Taq Man探针实时PCR技术具有高度的稳定性和可重复性。小麦品种间F. asiaticum DNA含量差异显著,接种10 d后比接种5 d后的DNA检测结果更能真实地反映不同品种(系)之间抗性水平的差异。在田间表现中抗水平的品种(系)之间接种10 d后F. asiaticum DNA含量也有显著差异。与田间鉴定结果比较,定量分析具有较好的区分作用。
英文摘要:
      To elucidate the relationship between the accumulation of Fusarium asiaticum in inoculated head tissues and the resistance of wheat cultivars, also to investigate the application value of quantification analysis in evaluating the resistance of wheat cultivar, real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-Q-PCR) based on Taq Man technology was used for the quantification of F.asiaticum DNA in the head tissues of 9 wheat varieties at 5 d and 10 d after fungal inoculation. TaqMan-based RT-Q-PCR assay was found to be highly reliable and reproducible in quantifying the F.asiaticum DNA. The amount of F.asiaticum DNA varied in different wheat varieties, quantification data at 10 d after inoculation (dai) was better than that at 5 dai in reflecting the cultivar′s resistance. The amount of F.asiaticum DNA varied in wheat varieties which were proved to be the same middle resistance level in the field. Compared with the resistance assessment in the field, quantification analysis was better in the discrimination of resistance level.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭

您是第19573789位访问者
版权所有麦类作物学报编辑部
京ICP备09084417号
技术支持: 本系统由北京勤云科技发展有限公司设计