敬告作者朋友
最近我们发现,有一些假冒本刊在线投稿系统的网站,采用与《麦类作物学报》相似的网页、网址和邮箱发送征稿通知以及收取审稿费、版面费的信息,以骗取钱财。详细情况见【通知公告】栏的“再次提醒作者朋友:谨防上当受骗!!!”

关闭
徐红明,刘红彦,王俊美,田保明,王鹏涛.小麦Mlo基因的克隆及白粉病菌诱导下的表达模式分析[J].麦类作物学报,2010,30(3):
小麦Mlo基因的克隆及白粉病菌诱导下的表达模式分析
Cloning and Expression Analysis of Mlo after Blumeria graminis f.sp. tritici Infection in Wheat
  
DOI:10.7606/j.issn.1009-1041.2010.03.001
中文关键词:  小麦  Mlo  电子克隆  表达模式
英文关键词:Wheat  Mlo  In silico cloning  Expression pattern
基金项目:河南省杰出青年基金在读硕士, 作物遗传育种专业。E mail:xhongming@163.com
作者单位
徐红明1,2,刘红彦2,王俊美2,田保明1,王鹏涛2 (1. 郑州大学生物工程系河南郑州 450001 2. 河南省农业科学院植物保护研究所河南郑州 450002) 
摘要点击次数: 1752
全文下载次数: 1741
中文摘要:
      为了研究Mlo基因在感、抗小麦品种中的表达情况,根据小麦基因芯片的Mlo探针序列,利用电子克隆与RT PCR方法在感病小麦品种豫麦13和抗病品种红蚰麦中分别克隆到Mlo基因的同源序列。两条核苷酸序列全长均为1 605 bp,都含有一个完整的ORF(Open reading frame)。核苷酸序列分析显示二者的DNA序列只有一个核苷酸的差异,与大麦Mlo的相似性均为90%。编码的氨基酸序列包含有7个跨膜结构域,前18个氨基酸是信号肽序列,第414~435位是编码蛋白的活性中心,第451、459、462、475、483位点上有糖基化位点,细胞定位分析将其定位在膜上。从头建模分析构建的二者三维结构有明显差异。利用定量PCR对该基因在白粉菌诱导早期的表达模式进行分析,结果两基因的表达都受白粉菌的诱导,但在红蚰麦中的表达高峰出现在18 h,豫麦13中的表达高峰出现在72 h,表达时间的差异可能决定了两者对白粉菌的不同抗性反应。
英文摘要:
      To investigate the expression mode of Mlo gene in susceptible and resistant wheat,two homological sequences of Mlo gene were cloned from susceptible cultivar Yumai 13 and resistant Hongyoumai by in silico cloning and RT PCR in this study, according to Mlo probe sequence of the wheat gene chip. Two obtained sequences differed in one nucleotide acid and both contained an integrated open reading frame of 1 605 bp length with 90% identical nucleotide with Mlo from baley. Amino acid analysis indicated that the encoded aa(amino acid)contained 7 transmembrane domains and original 18 amino acids were signal peptide. The aa during 414~435 was active site and 451, 459, 462, 475 and 483 aa were glycosylated. Mlo was located on cell membrane. Difference in the three dimensional structure was prominent between Mlo Yumai13 and Hongyoumai by ab initio prediction. Their expression pattern was analyzed by quantitative PCR, results demonstrated that expression of both genes were induced by Egt(Erysiphe graminis f. sp. tritici), the expression peak of Hongyoumai appeared in the time point of 18 h, while, 72 h of Yumai 13. The difference of expression peak may determine different resistant responses to Egt.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭

您是第19532049位访问者
版权所有麦类作物学报编辑部
京ICP备09084417号
技术支持: 本系统由北京勤云科技发展有限公司设计